Character Flaws of William Shakepeare\'s Antony

William Shakespe ares Antony and Cleopatra defies the stereotypes generated from any other Shakespearean drama. This essay bequeath demonstrate how Shakespeare adopts the use of imagery, speech and salient construction through egress the lay come in in portraying Antony as deeply flawed sum maintaining his stature as a tragical cuneus. Charles Moseley states, Renaissance plays are not books, but a visual and auditory bring played in a special building on a stage that carried out a great roll in the hay of symbolic charge for the audience. Antonys tragedy is caused by situations beyond his ability to change; he is torn between his reinforce and his life in Alexandria. At meanwhile, he is also influenced by a number of first inner flaws of reputation-his lack of political interest, impetuousness of character and a pursuit of personal pleasure. S Bethell suggests how Antony has a foot in both worlds. Shakespeare does not produce a hard task in making a tragic wedge out of Antony as Aristotle defines a tragic hero, as a character of noble stature who has a tragic flaw (over confidence, arrogance, hubris,), and sees a downfall that is partially their charge but also cod to factors beyond their control. The downfall they suffer exceeds the crime, but the tragic hero gains some sort of self-awareness. From this argument Antony is in every virtuoso a tragic hero as this essay will demonstrate. \nShakespeares use of language allows him to present Antony as a character to be pitied, which is prevalent in portraying a tragic hero. Antony is represented as, a strumpets fool. Helpless when faced with Cleopatras charms and womanly assets, likewise establishing a distinct link with the referee in accepting unitary of his weaknesses is Cleopatra. The striking imagery Shakespeare uses to encounter Cleopatra and Antonys relationship we are reminded of the image of the fish caught on her hook, and are in no way surprised to learn that at their fi...